articles amended or repealed · official counter, Aug-2026 verif·Aug 2026↗
Pillar statusON TRACKTrend▲ improving
The latest figure meets the promise we measure on this pillar.
What was promised
Regulatory chainsaw: eliminate rules, open imports, simplify the State (Sturzenegger).
Where it stands today
770 deregulation rules / 2,841 regulations amended or repealed / 17,115 articles (cumulative total to August 2026), according to the official counter of the Ministry of Deregulation and State Transformation. The month added 51 rules, 38 regulations and 344 articles. The 17,115 are articles amended or repealed: the official filter counts substitutions and amendments, not only repeals. And the ministry itself declares them a lower bound — the content of 40 rules covered is not online. verif·Aug 2026↗
16,771 fewer articles → the compliance cost that weighed most on SMEs without a legal department falls → starting a business gets genuinely cheaper (the regulatory chainsaw benefits the small player most). R4+R10
Import opening → incumbents lose the rent of protection → gaps open for entrants (e.g. OCTG: Welspun vs Tenaris, already mapped in opportunities). R4
Fewer discretionary permits = fewer windows → lower institutional cost, which country risk also prices (Country-risk pillar). R4+R1
What we watchJudicial reversal of reforms (precedent: the labor chapter of DNU 70/2023, ruled unconstitutional by the CNAT labor court of appeals on 30-Jan-2024 and still without a Supreme Court ruling) → degrades R2, R4. ⚠️ METHOD GAP MEASURED ON 2026-08-11 thesis: the official methodology nets out whatever CONGRESS restores and says nothing about JUDICIAL suspension ⇒ a rule whose effect has been halted by a court is still counted inside the 16,771. The live case is the DNU's Title IV. The bias is small there (order of ~0.5%, not sealed), but the direction matters and there is a precedent for the size: Chequeado measured 12% of rules halted by judicial decisions across 160 analyzed.
Policies and rules related to this pillar27
We do not attribute this indicator to a single rule. Here we gather the policies and rules we track because they can affect the conditions related to this pillar, each with its status and its source.
These markets belong to sectors whose activity also shows up in relation to this pillar. We show them to connect the aggregate indicator with concrete markets for goods and services that we track in the large projects. Their presence here does not mean this indicator is the cause of that demand.
The pillar shows the economic context. For a company we run a different cross-check: which projects buy what you make, who buys, when that purchase appears and what you would need to prepare to get in.
verif primary source · prob primary source pending · unconf a source said it · estim our own calculation · thesis our reading · the date belongs to the datum, at the precision its source allows