Despegue REFORMS ESEN
updated 2026-08-28
The norm, in detail

Biotech patents: the 2015 restriction falls

INPI Res. 197/2026
in forceNATIONAL Market deregulation

What changed and who it applies to

What changed
INPI Resolution 197/2026 repeals INPI Resolution 283/2015, which amended the patentability Guidelines (Res. 243/2003, Part C, Ch. IV) and restricted the patenting of living matter and biotechnological developments. With the repeal, Argentina returns to a biotechnological-patentability criterion aligned with international standards. It is the biotech-agri piece of a larger deregulatory package: in March 2026 the joint pharmaceutical-patenting guidelines had already been repealed (Joint Res. 118/2012, 546/2012 and 107/2012, via Joint Res. 1/2026). verif · Jun 19, 2026
In force
06/20/2026 (the day after publication in the Official Gazette of 06/19/2026). verif · Jun 20, 2026
Who it affects
Biotechnology developers (seed companies, agricultural biotech, laboratories) seeking to patent inventions on living matter in Argentina. It broadens patentable subject matter relative to the restrictive criterion in force since 2015. A tension point to watch without assuming bad faith: pharma/biotech patenting reopens the debate of patents vs. the local generics industry, outside the observatory's focus. verif · Jun 19, 2026
The norm
Resolución 197/2026 of the Instituto Nacional de la Propiedad Industrial (INPI), signed on Jun 18, 2026 and published in the Boletín Oficial on Jun 19, 2026 (notice 343326). It repeals Resolución INPI 283/2015. verif · Jun 19, 2026

Our reading

Fewer barriers to biotechnological patentability: by repealing the 2015 restriction, Argentina aligns with international patent standards on living matter and improves the incentive to invest in innovation, especially in agriculture (rule R4, deregulation / legal security). The seed sector welcomed the measure as a pro-investment signal in biotechnology. thesis

Where it lands, province by province

Applies the same nationwide

We looked at this rule from each of the five provinces we track and found no effect that lands differently in any of them: it applies the same across the country.

The other rules on this subject36

Mega-DNU: the regulatory chainsawDecree 70/2023 (DNU-2023-70-APN-PTE)in force
Rentals: freedom of contract returnsDNU 70/2023, art. 249in force
The IGJ digitizes companies' financial statementsIGJ General Res. 9/2026 (RESOG-2026-9-APN-IGJ#MJ), Official Gazette Jul 2, 2026in force
Domestic trade: price-control and intervention rules fallRes. 12/2026 SIC (Official Gazette Jun 9, 2026)in force
Ley Hojarasca: cleanup of the legal framework (still in the Senate)Bill CD-1/26 (half-sanction May 20, 2026)pending
Weekly newsletter · free

Get on board the takeoff

This week’s updates: reforms, RIGI and verified program data and new provinces as they launch. Free.

no spam we read every one
Which are you?
What are you looking for?
Tell us more
Your provinces empty = all
pick one or more
Fact sheet built on the published rule, with the gaps declared. Back to the reforms
How to read the seals →   verif primary source · prob primary source pending · unconf not sufficiently backed · estim our own calculation · thesis our reading