Despegue ← San Juan OPPORTUNITY
13 more opportunitiesOther opportunities ▾
ESEN Where my company can get in
San Juan · Process inputs · what is consumed every day while the mine is milling
Lime is already made in the province and there is a surplus; what is missing is the proof that it meets a mine's specificationthesis

Metallurgical lime, agglomeration cement and leaching process reagents

Estimated entry range for a supplier
~USD 0.6 M/yr today, and another scale from 2030
Estimated market: USD 4.3-8.3 M/yr today
up to date · reviewed Aug 31, 2026
estim Aug 31, 2026midpoint ~USD 6.3 M/yrwindow openour reading
At a glance
Who buys
The two gold operations that already bill this spend
the 3 doors →
In which projects
Gualcamayo, Leaching Phases 8 and 9 expansion, Vicuña
what each one invests →
When
The reagent is operating expenditure: it is bought every day and there is no window that closes. What is dated is the jump in scale: Vicuña produces around 2030, and the qualification has to be done before they buy, not afterwards. thesis
what to watch and where it stands →
The main barrier
There is spare lime capacity in the province, so the kiln holds nothing back. What holds it back is qualification: the mine assays the lime and changes supplier slowly, and one step before that comes the fact that nobody publishes the specification of the product. thesis
the whole entry map →
Where you get in
San Juan is not short of lime: there is a surplus. What is missing is the proof that it works for a mine —no lime producer publishes its technical data sheet— and having it close by: Vicuña's silos are designed for seven days, and that is the layer that decides who can sell:
the 4 routes →

When you go looking for how much lime a gold mine consumes, it is not there: nobody publishes the ratio of kilos per tonne. But two technical reports publish the dollars, and that is enough. Veladero, which does not agglomerate, spends fifteen cents of a dollar per tonne across lime, cyanide and zinc. Gualcamayo, which does agglomerate, pays USD 2.00 per tonne more simply to move from oxide to sulphide ore, and its own report says that difference is lime, cement and cyanide. Together they say what neither says alone: what decides the size of this market is not how much lime is used, it is which ore is processed — and San Juan is about to change ore. The Vicuña technical report, of March 2026, confirms it and adds a physical condition that decides who can sell: lime is the pH modifier of its three stages, and its lime silos are designed for seven days of stock against thirty for every other reagent. Seven days of autonomy is not an engineering detail: it is a requirement of proximity.

This is the only San Juan niche whose market already bills every day and does not depend on any project starting: the reagent is operating expenditure, it is consumed while the mine is processing and it has no window.

See the clocks that are running, one by one
Today it is small —Veladero and Gualcamayo between them stack some 30 million tonnes a year— and the large scale has a date: when Vicuña comes into production around 2030 with a 175,000-tonne-per-day concentrator, the province will process more than twice what it processes today, and in copper flotation lime is the reagent that consumes the most mass. What changed is what has to be ready by then: not a kiln —the province already has capacity to spare— but the qualification done with the mines that are already operating.

verif primary sourceestim our own calculationthesis our readingHow to read all five →

What the market is made of

The split of this niche is decided by what can be made here and what cannot. Cyanide is made by a handful of plants worldwide under licence and an international management code, and it weighs twice what lime does per tonne processed. Lime and cement are indeed made in San Juan: the province has 2.1 million tonnes of installed lime capacity and sold 1.1 in 2025.

How it splits, and against which total
Split over the midpoint TAM of ~USD 6.3 M/yr of today's market. Own estimate. The 2030 scale is not in this pie. estim
CaptiveUSD 4 M · 58%
Addressable (SAM)USD 2.3 M · 33%
Realistic wedge for an entrantUSD 0.6 M · 9%
CaptiveUSD 4 M58%non-addressable
mining-grade sodium cyanide and the zinc used in precipitation: a handful of plants worldwide, licensing, an international management code and the miner auditing its supplier
Addressable (SAM)USD 2.3 M33%addressable
metallurgical-grade lime and agglomeration cement —which the province can already produce with idle capacity— plus the storage, conditioning and last mile of every reagent
Realistic wedge for an entrantUSD 0.6 M9%addressable
qualifying the lime already produced in the province and getting it vetted with the two operations that are running, or entering through storage and the last mile, which need neither kiln nor quarry
Non-addressable

Mining-grade sodium cyanide and the zinc used in precipitation: a handful of plants worldwide, licensing and an international management code, with the miner auditing its supplier. At Veladero they weigh USD 0.08 and USD 0.03 per tonne processed against lime's USD 0.04. ~USD 4.0 M/yr, 63 % of the midpoint. estim

Addressable share

Metallurgical-grade lime and agglomeration cement —which the province already produces, with idle capacity— plus the storage, conditioning and last mile of every reagent, which is a service rather than a product. ~USD 2.3 M/yr, 37 % of the midpoint. estim

Entry range for a supplier

It is not building a lime plant: the province already has capacity to spare. It is the storage, conditioning and last mile of the reagent —a service rather than a product— and, on the lime side, doing the qualification work nobody did: testing, publishing the specification and getting vetted mine by mine. ~USD 0.6 M/yr at first, multiplying when the copper concentrator comes online. thesis

▸ The binding limit is that the 2030 scale still has no number: the Vicuña technical report was read in full and it publishes the reagents of its three stages, but not the lime intensity. The second limit is that the Veladero tonnage holding up the arithmetic is from 2017. And the third, the most important one for deciding: the province's lime plant running at half throttle does not prove its lime is of use to a mine, because nobody published the specification.

Who really pays?

Three payers, and the third does not buy yet but is the one that decides whether the kiln is worth building:

If you sellThe lime and the agglomeration cement of gold leaching
→
The two gold operations that already bill this spend verif 2018 ↗

Veladero pays this spend every month: its 2018 technical report gives USD 0.04 of lime per tonne processed over 28 to 29.5 million tonnes a year between 2014 and 2017, and describes the lime added to the crushed ore with no agglomeration stage verif. At Gualcamayo, the 2021 technical report attributes the extra USD 2 per tonne it costs to process sulphide ore to agglomeration lime and cement, together with more cyanide verif; today its output centres on re-leaching the heaps already built prob. Our reading: Gualcamayo spends more lime and cement per tonne than Veladero, over a much smaller tonnage thesis.

If you sellThe storage, conditioning and last mile of imported reagent
→
The same two operations, and their process contractors thesis

This is the door that needs no kiln. It includes cyanide, which is half the spend and which nobody is going to manufacture here, but which does have to be received, stored and hauled up to the mine to international management standard. A service rather than a product: it enters with far less capital and qualifies faster.

If you sellThe lime of the new plants: Vicuña's copper flotation and the Carbonatos Profundos gold plant at Gualcamayo
→
A copper concentrator from 2030, and a gold operation with its expansion project from 2029 or 2030 prob ↗

They do not buy yet. Vicuña's state act is already published and sets 31 December 2028 as the deadline to meet its minimum investment verif, and its technical report places the first year of production in 2030 verif. Gualcamayo's operator announces Carbonatos Profundos production for 2029, although its own schedule puts start-up in 2030 prob. Our reading: they are the reason this niche exists thesis.

▸
What is no longer needed is building the kiln: the capacity is installed and unused, and the work that is missing is the work nobody did — testing, publishing the specification and qualifying.

Which projects move this demand

Engineering, construction, operation and maintenance of new leach pads (phases 8 and 9) at Veladero Mine, to sustain gold production and exports…

see the project →

Reactivation and deepening of the Gualcamayo gold and silver mine (San Juan): the 'Deep Carbonates (DCP)' project extends the mine life toward the sulfide orebody at depth…

see the project →
USD 9,700 M Jun 16, 2026 ↗

The largest mining project in Argentine history by announced investment, and, according to the operator…

see the project →

When the window opens

Reagent spend moves with two things and no more: how many tonnes are processed and which ore they are. These four numbers say it before anyone else.

What to watchWhat changes when it happensStatus
The tonnes processed per year in the province
It is the direct multiplier: reagent spending is intensity per tonne, and the only thing that moves is the tonnage.
29.5 · 28.4 · 28.0 · 28.8 million tonnes at Veladero between 2014 and 2017. ⚠️ This is the series published up to 2017 and it is re-measured when the next technical report comes out verif 2017 ↗
The lime the province can produce against the lime it sells
It says whether the entrant has to build or only has to sell. With idle capacity, putting up a new kiln competes against one that is already paid for.
2.1 million tonnes of installed capacity in San Juan against 1.1 million sold in 2025, stated by the general manager of the main lime plant.
See the evidence
the company says it operates «at a little over 50 % of capacity». It is a series and it is re-measured
prob Feb 20, 2026 ↗
The reagents of Vicuña's three stages, and the seven days of silo
It defines when the large demand arrives and of what type, and puts the proximity condition in writing: seven days of stock force a continuous, short supply.
lime as a pH modifier in stages 1 and 3; sulphuric acid, sodium cyanide, lime, flocculant, cement, sodium hydrosulphite, extractant and zinc dust in stage 2.
See the evidence
Published processing cost: USD 4.13 · 5.47 · 11.16 per tonne depending on the circuit, out of USD 19.60 in total
verif Mar 2026 ↗
The export duty on lime
It decides whether the San Juan lime plant has a customer outside mining. Today more than half of what the province sells goes to Chile, which has no limestone of its own of the quality its large mining operations demand.
zero per cent since 8 August 2025 for the mining products in the Annex of Decreto 563/2025.
See the evidence
⚠️ Whether quicklime, slaked lime, hydraulic lime and limestone (tariff lines 2522.10.00, 2522.20.00, 2522.30.00 and 2521.00.00) are in that Annex we could not confirm: the Annex could not be opened
unconf Aug 7, 2025
What signals the game has changed
The kiln this market needed already exists, and it is running at half throttle

The risk in this niche runs the opposite way to how it looks: financing a new lime plant is the bad deal. The province has 2.1 million tonnes of installed capacity and sold 1.1 in 2025, with the main lime plant running at around half prob sector press.

See the evidence
Building new capacity competes against capacity already paid for and unused, and that is why entry into this niche stopped being industrial and became commercial: qualify, specify and place.
The lime intensity of a copper flotation is not published, and we looked for it where it ought to be

The entire 2030 argument rests on lime being the reagent of greatest mass in copper flotation, which is known process physics, but no open source publishes how much.

See the evidence
The Vicuña technical report was read in full, 418 pages: it confirms lime across all three stages and the seven-day silos, publishes the aggregate processing cost per tonne, and does not break out the flotation lime line. The only physical figure it carries is the heap-leach agglomeration one: 12 kg of cement and 3 kg of lime per tonne of agglomerated material. Until somebody publishes it, the size of 2030 is a direction, not a number.
Cyanide, which is half the spend, is not contestable

It weighs twice what lime does per tonne processed verif Veladero technical report, Table 21-4 and is made by a handful of plants worldwide under licence and an international management code.

See the evidence
An entrant who adds up total reagent spend and believes that is their market is counting someone else's pocket: what is addressable in that part is the storage, the conditioning and the last mile, not the molecule.
Changing reagent supplier changes the mine's recovery

An off-specification lime batch moves the circuit's pH and with it the gold recovery the operation lives on. That is why the miner tests, qualifies and changes slowly. The qualification cycle is measured in months and price does not shorten it.

See the remaining 3 risks
The tonnage holding up the number is from 2017 and has to be dated

The 28.8 million tonnes come from Table 21-3 of a 2018 report. The 2014-2017 series moved less than 6 %, and phases 8 and 9 —with a published act of State and USD 436 M— extend the leach valley, so the order of magnitude holds.

See the evidence
But the durable part of this number is the intensity in dollars per tonne; the tonnage is the part that ages, and it gets re-measured when Barrick publishes its next report.
A mining operator can integrate backwards and keep its own consumption

Minas Argentinas has already flagged the lime business inside its second Gualcamayo project. If it does it, it not only stops buying: it is left with installed capacity to sell to the rest of the province, and it does so from inside a mining operation, with the limestone and the permit already sorted.

Nobody has ever published that San Juan lime meets the metallurgical specification

This is the gap that remains, and it is one of evidence, not of capacity. We looked for a product data sheet at the province's scale lime plant and there is only a safety data sheet.

See the evidence
we looked for a named mining customer and there is none, neither on the lime plant's side nor on the side of the two mines in operation. It does not follow from this that the lime is unfit: what follows is that nobody has demonstrated it in public, and that demonstrating it is the cheapest step in the niche.

The opportunity in depth

How to get inthe gap and the routes that open it
1

The capacity is already installed and unused. The province has 2.1 million tonnes of lime capacity and sold 1.1 in 2025; the large-scale lime plant runs at around half of what it can, and the province places more than half of what it sells through exports, mostly to Chile. Putting up a new kiln competes against a kiln already paid for.

2

What does not exist is the proof. No San Juan lime plant publishes reactivity, particle size or available calcium oxide — the large-scale one offers the safety data sheet and no product data sheet — and none names a mining customer. A mine buyer cannot even begin to compare with what is published.

3

And there is a door that needs neither kiln nor quarry: the storage, conditioning and last mile of imported reagent, to international standard for cyanide. It is a service rather than a product, and it enters with far less capital.

4

The layer that decides is physical and it is written in a document. Vicuña's lime silos are designed for seven days of stock, against thirty for every other reagent. Seven days of autonomy forces continuous, nearby supply: it is the condition a supplier a thousand kilometres away cannot meet, and the one a San Juan supplier already meets without investing anything.

What you needcapital, certification, tax regime and who pays
Reagent spend per tonne, without agglomerating
USD 0.15 — cyanide 0.08, lime 0.04, zinc 0.03
How much agglomerating adds
USD 2.00 more per tonne: more than tenfold
What San Juan processes today
some 30 million tonnes a year across the two operations
What Vicuña alone would process from 2030
175,000 tonnes a day — some 64 million a year
Installed lime capacity in the province, and how much was sold
2.1 million tonnes against 1.1 sold in 2025
How many days of lime the copper project keeps in its silos
seven, against thirty for the other reagents
▸ You tell us where to see what your company does and we tell you whether we see a sign that it fits this opportunity, with the evidence behind it. See if my company fits this opportunity →
When you get paid, and what blocks it
High, and of a particular kind: reagent is not compared on price, it is compared on consistency. An off-specification lime batch moves the circuit's pH and with it the gold recovery, so what the miner is buying is not a tonne of lime but the certainty that the next thousand will be identical. That favours the qualified supplier and penalises whoever offers a discount, and it explains why the qualification cycle is long. The flip side is that, once qualified, the supplier bills every month for decades — the exact opposite of the construction niches, which switch off when the works end.
Who you compete againstwho is already there and what share they take
Who is
already in
Market
split
The large-scale lime plant the province already hasfour kilns lit and 600,000 t/yr of declared capacity

The province's industrial lime plant, and the one that decides the premise of the whole niche. It has four 300-tonne-per-day Maerz PFR kilns «in operation» —the fourth was lit in June 2026—, a fifth in engineering and two 150 t/day vertical kilns of installed capacity, plus a crushing, screening and bagging plant.

See the evidence
it certified ISO 9001, 14001 and 45001 in 2022 and recertified in August 2025; and its own site lists mining among the uses of its lime, verbatim, as a *«depressant and alkalising agent in the flotation of Cu, Zn, Pb and Ni ores»* and a *«pH regulator in the extraction of Au and Ag in cyanide leaching»*. And yet it publishes not a single mining customer nor a single product specification, and its general manager stated in February 2026 that the company runs *«at a little over 50 % of capacity»* because *«our production capacity today comfortably exceeds current demand»* prob. ⇒ if the barrier were the kiln, it would already be inside.
The global supplier of mining-grade cyanidea little over half the reagent spend of a leach operation

This is the part of the niche that is not contested, and it is worth saying up front: mining-grade sodium cyanide is made by a handful of plants worldwide, it is transported and stored under the International Cyanide Management Code, and the miner audits its supplier.

See the evidence
At Veladero it weighs USD 0.08 per tonne processed verif against lime's USD 0.04 — twice as much. What is addressable in that part is not the molecule: it is the storage, the conditioning and the last mile to international standard.
A mining operator in the province, which has stated it wants into the lime businessnothing yet, but it is the operator with the clearest signal

Worth watching because it is not a supplier wanting to sell: it is an operator wanting to integrate backwards. It flagged the lime business inside its second Gualcamayo project, on the high-purity limestone of its own deposit.

See the evidence
If it does it, it stops buying and is also left with capacity to sell to everyone else, from inside a mining operation and with the limestone and the permit already sorted. It is the hardest competitor to anticipate because today it does not exist as a supplier.
The cement companies, for the agglomeration cementthe cement share of the agglomerated block

Agglomeration cement travels the same network as construction cement and its owners are the usual ones. It is the part of the niche where an entrant has least to do — except storage and the last mile to the mine, which is a service rather than a product, and there proximity counts again.

The jobs it createsWhat this niche can leave behind is not a new company: it is putting to work an industry the province already has and that today runs at half throttle.

the detail on jobs and trades
San Juan has produced lime for decades, exports more than half of what it sells —570,000 tonnes in 2025, mostly to Chile, which has no limestone of its own of the quality its large mining operations demand— and has around a million tonnes of capacity to spare. San Juan copper buying San Juan lime turns idle capacity into production without a peso invested in a kiln, and sustains skilled employment that already exists. And it does not depend on mining: lime is used in water treatment, in soil stabilisation for road works and in steelmaking, so the same plant has customers outside the sector — which is exactly what the rest of the satellite niches lack, all of them tied to a single buyer.

How we
calculate it

The number is our own estimate. The calculation, step by step, is below.

The full calculation, step by step
Annualisation window: NONE, and that is what separates this niche from the province's other twelve. The reagent is operating expenditure: it is consumed every day while the plant is processing, across the 20 to 40 years of each mine's life. It spreads no capital outlay and divides over no years. ⚠️ Practical consequence: its TAM/yr is not compared with that of the San Juan niches that annualise a construction project, because those switch off when the works end and this one does not.WHAT WE WERE LOOKING FOR DOES NOT EXIST, AND WHAT TURNED UP IS BETTER. This niche entered the perimeter with a warning: *the lime consumption ratio —kilos per tonne of ore— is published by nobody*. That is still true. But opening the two primary sources turned up something that makes the ratio unnecessary: the intensity in dollars. The Veladero technical report publishes reagent spend per tonne processed and by reagent, on separate lines, and its other table publishes the tonnage. With those two, the number is calculated without the physical ratio.THE TWO ANCHORS, AND WHAT THEY SAY TOGETHER.- Veladero, which does NOT agglomerate — Table 21-4 of the technical report, verbatim: cyanide USD 0.08/t · lime USD 0.04/t · zinc USD 0.03/t processed. The three together add up to fifteen cents of a dollar per tonne. And Table 21-3 gives the tonnage: 29.5 · 28.4 · 28.0 · 28.8 million tonnes between 2014 and 2017.- Gualcamayo, which DOES agglomerate — page 17-3 of its technical report, verbatim: *«The average operating cost for the period was US$ 6.14/t ore placed for oxide material. Operating costs for sulphide bearing material are approximately US$ 2.00/t higher or US$ 8.14/t because of increased lime and cement costs for agglomeration, as well as increased cyanide consumption»*.⭐ And here is the finding, which neither primary source states on its own: agglomerating multiplies reagent spend more than tenfold. Veladero, without agglomerating, spends those fifteen cents per tonne. Gualcamayo pays USD 2.00 per tonne more simply to move from oxide to sulphide, and that difference is precisely lime, cement and cyanide. ⇒ what decides the size of this market is not how much lime is used: it is which ore is processed. And the province is about to change ore.THE CALCULATION. Veladero block: 28.0-29.5 million tonnes × USD 0.15/t = USD 4.2-4.4 M/yr, the firm and narrow part. Gualcamayo block: 0.9-1.8 million tonnes stacked × USD 0.15-2.15/t = USD 0.1-3.9 M/yr — the floor is that of a heap that does not agglomerate and the ceiling is that same floor plus the whole sulphide increment, so the band is deliberately wide because the report does not break out the oxide's reagent. Total: USD 4.3-8.3 M/yr, midpoint ~USD 6.3 M.WHAT IS DECLARED AND NOT ADDED, BECAUSE IT IS WHAT DECIDES THE NICHE. Four operations change this arithmetic before 2031 and none has a published reagent intensity:1. Vicuña, from ~2030: a 175,000-tonne-per-day concentrator, some 64 million a year, with a declared expansion to 293,000. That is more than twice everything San Juan processes today, and in copper flotation lime is the reagent of greatest mass because it controls the circuit's pH. ⇒ the San Juan lime market is decided in 2030.2. Gualcamayo DCP, from 2029 or 2030: milling and flotation of 3,500 to 4,000 tonnes per day, with a published state act.3. Hualilán: a 1.5-million-tonne-a-year flotation plant plus a heap circuit.4. Los Azules: it is SX/EW and consumes sulphuric acid, not lime as its main reagent. Different molecule, different chain, different supplier: it does not belong in this niche and we say so, so nobody adds it.⛔ None of the four is quantified here, and the reason is the same one that makes the rest credible: there is no published intensity for an Argentine copper flotation. The document where it ought to be —the Vicuña technical report, March 2026, 418 pages— was downloaded and read in full on 14 September 2026: it confirms lime as the pH modifier of all three stages and publishes the aggregate processing cost per tonne, but it does not break out the flotation lime line. So the 2030 scale still has no figure of its own, and now it is on record where we looked. The only item with a published physical intensity is heap-leach agglomeration: 12 kg of cement and 3 kg of lime per tonne of agglomerated material, a purchase a San Juan supplier can size as soon as the tonnage sent to the heap is known.THE BOUNDARY WITH NEIGHBOURING NICHES. The trunk freight from Buenos Aires to San Juan is not here: the province's logistics niche counts it. The sulphuric acid of SX/EW is a different chain. Grinding media —balls and liners— are steel, not chemistry, and are not added. And the activated carbon of the adsorption step is not broken out in either primary source, so no number is put on it: the same criterion with which the sister niche in Salta refused to put a number on Lindero.

Concentration Split in two, and the division is what defines the strategy. Cyanide is highly concentrated: a handful of plants worldwide, licensing, an international management code and auditing by the miner — there is no door there for an entrant, and it weighs twice what lime does in the spend per tonne. Lime and cement are far less concentrated, and in the province there is a surplus of them: San Juan has 2.1 million tonnes of installed lime capacity and sold 1.1 in 2025, with the main lime plant running at around half of what it can. That is why the barrier is neither the quarry nor the kiln: it is qualification —reactivity and particle size tested by each operation— and, one step before that, publishing a specification that nobody publishes today.

The rule that moves it

Here the rule does not create the demand —the reagent is consumed either way— but it decides something finer and more useful: whether lime made in San Juan counts as local content for the miner that uses it, which is what can tip the decision to buy from a new lime plant rather than the usual supplier:

See the underlying reading

The underlying policy that opens up this demand. It is the same inference declared by the rules and the program pillars pushing in this direction.

cheaper to respond: investing takes time, held-back supply shows up at once
enables
San Juan: 80/60 local mining procurement
See the rule →
The law sets a target of 60 % local content and creates a provincial supplier register to measure it. In this niche the effect is direct and unusual: lime is one of the few process inputs the province already manufactures, and with capacity to spare, so moving that consumption to a San Juan supplier shifts the numerator of that target with a single contract and without investing in a plant.
See the full legal grounds
⚠️ But the register's requirements are simultaneous —licensed premises, legal and tax domicile, 80 % San Juan personnel and a fleet registered in the province— plus a rootedness criterion of your choosing, and there is a minimum trading history. A reagent supplier is planned with that built in from day one; it is not retrofitted afterwards.

Where the number comes from

USD 4.3-8.3 M/yr today, midpoint ~USD 6.3 M. ⛔ And what governs is not that number but what comes next: in 2030 the province would process more than twice as much, and that part is not here

See the calculation, the variables and how it was validated

Two blocks, one firm and one deliberately wide. The first rests on two published tables; the second on a band the report does not break out.

the 28.0-29.5 million tonnes Veladero stacks per year × USD 0.15 per tonne of lime, cyanide and zinc + the 0.9-1.8 million tonnes Gualcamayo stacks agglomerated × USD 0.15-2.15 per tonne=USD 4.3-8.3 M/yr today, midpoint ~USD 6.3 M
Tonnes Veladero stacks per year28.0 to 29.5 millionlive data
Published series 2014-2017: 29.5 · 28.4 · 28.0 · 28.8 million. It moved less than 6 % in four years. It is the ageing figure in this calculation, and it is re-measured when the next technical report comes out. Phases 8 and 9, with a published act of State and USD 436 M, extend the leach valley.
Reagent spend per tonne, without agglomeratingUSD 0.15annual review
Verbatim from Table 21-4: cyanide 0.08, lime 0.04 and zinc 0.03 dollars per tonne processed, on separate lines. It is the durable part of the number. And it says something strategic: cyanide weighs twice what lime does, and cyanide is not made here.
Tonnes Gualcamayo stacks per year0.9 to 1.8 millionlive data
The published plan for 2021 was to stack 1,805,532 tonnes. The operation later moved to secondary recovery from already-irrigated heaps, which moves less material, and that is why the floor drops by half. It is the least firm figure in the calculation.
Reagent spend per tonne, agglomeratingUSD 0.15 a 2.15annual review
Deliberately wide. The floor is that of a heap that does not agglomerate; the ceiling is that floor plus the whole increment the Gualcamayo report attributes to the change of ore —USD 2.00 per tonne of lime, cement and extra cyanide. The report does not break out the oxide's reagent, so nothing is invented: the band is declared.

The number rests on a few variables. The formula shows how it moves when each one changes; and each variable carries its freshness seal — how often it is worth revisiting. estim

How solid the number is estim

San Juan does not import its lime: it makes it, and it has a surplus. The province has a lime plant with installed industrial capacity running at half throttle, so this niche's gap is not in the kiln.What there is, opened with our own eyes on 14 September 2026:

whatwho publishes it
Four 300-tonne-per-day Maerz PFR kilns «in operation», a fifth in engineering, two 150 t/day vertical kilns of installed capacity, and a crushing, screening and bagging plantCaleras San Juan S.A., on its own site
Its lime is fit for mining: *«depressant and alkalising agent in the flotation of Cu, Zn, Pb and Ni ores»*, *«pH regulator in the extraction of Au and Ag in cyanide leaching»*the same
ISO 9001, 14001 and 45001 since 2022, recertified in August 2025the same
The fourth kiln was lit in June 2026 and with it capacity reaches 600,000 tonnes a year prob Cámara Minera de San Juanthe Cámara Minera de San Juan
The province has 2.1 million tonnes of capacity and sold 1.1 in 2025, and the company runs *«at a little over 50 % of capacity»*its general manager, in a February 2026 interview
⭐ And that changes where the business is. There are of the order of a million tonnes of unused capacity, and more than half of what the province sells is exported —570,000 tonnes in 2025, mostly to Chile— because the domestic construction and steelmaking market is weak.⛔ What we did NOT find, and it is exactly what decides whether that lime is of use to a mine: neither of the two product sheets a mining buyer would look at publishes a specification —the only downloadable document is the safety data sheet, the same one for both— and there is no reactivity, particle size, available calcium oxide or standard complied with. Nor did we find a single named mining customer, at that company or at any other San Juan lime plant. We do not claim it does not sell: we claim nobody publishes it.The two primary sources behind today's number, and what each of them says:
documentwhat it publisheswhere
Veladero technical report (Barrick, March 2018, 183 pages)Cyanide USD 0.08 · Lime USD 0.04 · Zinc USD 0.03 per tonne processed, on separate linesTable 21-4
the sameTonnes processed: 29.5 · 28.4 · 28.0 · 28.8 million between 2014 and 2017Table 21-3
Gualcamayo technical report (Mineros, September 2021, 228 pages)Variable processing: USD 6.14/t for oxide ore and USD 8.14/t for sulphide verif Gualcamayo technical report, Table 21-3Table 21-3
the sameVerbatim: the USD 2.00/t difference is *«increased lime and cement costs for agglomeration, as well as increased cyanide consumption»*page 17-3
Vicuña technical report (March 2026, 418 pages, downloaded and read in full)Lime is the pH modifier of stages 1 and 3, and one of the eight reagents of stage 2. And the lime silos are designed for seven days, against thirty days of stock for every other reagent§ 17.7.3
⛔ What that report does NOT carry, and we looked for it across its 418 pages: the lime intensity. For flotation, neither kilos per tonne nor a lime line in dollars. The only physical figure is the heap-leach agglomeration one: *«12 kg of cement and 3 kg of lime per tonne of material»*, which applies to the material sent to the heap and not to all the ore. It publishes the aggregate processing cost —USD 4.13 per tonne in the Josemaría sulphides, 5.47 in the Filo ones and 11.16 in the leach, on a total of USD 19.60 per tonne for the whole circuit— and says reagent consumption *«was based on metallurgical test work»* without breaking it out. So the 2030 scale remains a firm direction rather than a figure — but now it is on record where we looked.⚠️ And a warning about the tonnage: the 28.8 million are from 2017. The full series moved less than 6 % in four years and phases 8 and 9 extend the leach valley with a published state act and USD 436 M, so the order of magnitude holds. The durable part of this number is the intensity in dollars; the tonnage is the part that ages.

How to cite this figure: Despegue (2026). Metallurgical lime, agglomeration cement and leaching process reagents · San Juan. despegueargentina.com/en/san-juan/cal-metalurgica-reactivos-lixiviacion · terms of use

Neighbouring markets3 markets in the same group, from USD 25 to USD 60 M a year

First step · free
The first read of your company

We look at what your company does and tell you whether we see a sign that it fits this market, with the evidence behind it. If we do not see one, we say so too and name the condition that would change it. One page as a dated PDF, within 48 working hours.

Not here for a company? Invest · Work (in Spanish) · Start a business (in Spanish) · Institutions
Page 1 of the example executive summaryOpen the report ↗A real analysis · a real company, open in full →
Ignacio Aredez
Analysis and curation: Ignacio Aredez
Head of Despegue
Method and track record →
  • 20+ years in technology, 15 of them in data and AI, for clients across Europe and the Americas
  • Certified in AI governance (ISO/IEC 42001)
  • Machine Learning (Google Cloud)
  • Registered expert with the European Commission
How to read the seals →
  verif primary source · prob primary source pending · unconf a source said it · estim our own calculation · thesis our reading · the date belongs to the datum, at the precision its source allows
This is not financial advice. The TAM is an estimate with a transparent method, not an official figure; the framing is labeled as thesis. Every figure carries its source. ← All opportunities in San Juan