Despegue ← Catamarca OPPORTUNITY
11 more opportunitiesOther opportunities ▾
ESEN Where my company can get in
Catamarca · Puna above 4,000 meters · isolated generation, diesel and conversion to hybrid
The spending runs today, but the customer itself published its plan to shrink itthesis

Isolated power in Catamarca's puna: operating and maintaining the diesel plants and converting them to hybrid

Estimated entry range for a supplier
~USD 0.35 M/yr
Estimated market: USD 2.5-4.9 M/yr
up to date · reviewed Sep 14, 2026
estim Aug 30, 2026midpoint ~USD 3.7 M/yrurgent demandour reading
At a glance
Who buys
The operator, under an availability contract with penalties
the 3 doors →
In which projects
Fénix, Hombre Muerto Oeste, Salar Tres Quebradas
what each one invests →
When
None of the three high-voltage lines announced towards the Catamarca puna has a tender called, so this spend runs every single day, with no cut-off date. The day one of them is called, diesel starts having an expiry date. prob Mar 25, 2026 ↗
what to watch and where it stands →
The main barrier
It is not capital and it is not the equipment: it is having spares and people up on the salt flat when the road closes. The plant belongs to the mine and as of 16-09-2026 the mine runs it with its own staff, so the only thing that can be sold is what the operator lacks: availability. thesis
the whole entry map →
Where you get in
The gap is not in the equipment —the brand supplies that— but in the service nobody provides from within the province: operating the plant, supplying it with diesel and storing energy. And there is a fourth route, with a different buyer: the two parks still to be built.
the 4 routes →

Energy is 30 % of the operating cost of a brine lithium mine: USD 943 per tonne of carbonate, the second-largest expense after reagents and above all of labor. In Catamarca, two of the four operations still run on diesel above 4,000 meters of altitude. The other two already left: Fénix with a dedicated 135-kilometer gas pipeline and Tres Quebradas with its own 132 kV line unconf. That makes this market far smaller than it looks — and its shape is about to flip, because Sal de Vida's technical report already sets the goal of 30 % of its first stage's energy coming from the sun, and across all of Catamarca's puna there is not a single installed battery reported by any source.

This niche's window opens and closes at the same time, and reading that correctly is the whole point. It opens because two operations burn diesel every single day and none of the three announced high-voltage lines has a meter built.

See the clocks that are running, one by one
It closes because the buyer itself says out loud that it wants out of diesel: Sal de Vida's technical report plans a 6 MW diesel plant that would run in hybrid mode with a solar plant, with the goal of 30 % of its first stage's energy coming from the sun. Anyone entering to sell diesel arrives late; anyone entering to operate today's plant and convert it later arrives exactly on time.

verif primary sourceestim our own calculationthesis our readingHow to read all five →

What the market is made of

This niche's split is harsh and worth seeing before investing: most of the energy bill is not contractable. The diesel molecule is bought from the oil company and the equipment is controlled by the brand. What is left —and it is all this figure counts— is operating and maintaining what is already installed, and then converting it.

How it splits, and against which total
Split over the midpoint TAM of ~USD 3.7 M/yr. Own estimate. Diesel (around USD 13 M/yr) is not in this pie: it is not a supplier market. estim
CaptiveUSD 1.4 M · 34%
Addressable (SAM)USD 2.3 M · 57%
Realistic wedge for an entrantUSD 0.3 M · 9%
CaptiveUSD 1.4 M34%non-addressable
the imported equipment, original spares and warranty service controlled by the manufacturer, plus the fuel supply contract with the oil company
Addressable (SAM)USD 2.3 M57%addressable
operating and maintaining the plants on site —which the reference technical report itself excludes in writing from its energy cost— plus the fuel farm with consumption telemetry and the engineering of the conversion to hybrid
Realistic wedge for an entrantUSD 0.3 M9%addressable
the maintenance retainer for a single plant, with a base in the area and spares in stock: it is the cheapest door because it does not require buying the equipment and the customer already has the problem
Non-addressable

The equipment and original spares —gensets, turbines, switchboards and their warranty service— which the manufacturer controls and which are also imported. Plus the supply of the diesel molecule, which is a contract with the oil company.

Addressable share

Operating and maintaining the existing plants, the on-site fuel farm with its consumption telemetry, and the engineering and construction of the conversion to hybrid with batteries.

Entry range for a supplier

The maintenance contract for a single plant, with a base in the area and spares in stock. It is the cheapest door: it does not require buying the equipment, it is billed as a retainer and the customer already has the problem.

▸ Nobody publishes the installed self-generation capacity of the private plants, so the figure is built from cost per tonne rather than from MW. And the capex of the conversion to hybrid is not quantified: the only measured precedent gives a per-MW unit cost that almost certainly includes electrical works unrelated to the park.

Who really pays?

There are three payers and they differ from one another — different purchasing process, different timeline and different collection risk:

If you sellThe operation and maintenance retainer for a mine's power plant
→
The operator, under an availability contract with penalties verif Mar 31, 2022 ↗

It is the highest-margin contract in the business because what is sold is not a repair: it is that the plant does not stop. A plant down at an evaporation operation does not cost a day, it costs a process window. Today that layer is handled by the operator itself with plant staff.

If you sellThe engineering, construction and later maintenance of the conversion to solar with batteries
→
The operator, as a capital project with a declared return prob Mar 31, 2022 ↗

Sal de Vida's technical report already sets the goal of 30 % of its first stage's energy coming from the sun prob. The reference case is Lindero, in Salta: 40 % less diesel prob; the annual saving in dollars is not published unconf.

If you sellThe hybrid parks and the grid for the puna's towns
→
The Salar del Hombre Muerto mining trust, through the provincial distributor prob Nov 2019 ↗

This payer is not the mine and almost nobody looks at it. The Salar del Hombre Muerto mining trust already financed both existing parks —Antofagasta de la Sierra and El Peñón, the latter awarded to a contractor with a tender budget of around USD 1.5 M in 2019— prob and would have two more unbuilt unconf. It tenders rather than takes quotes: the process is public procurement.

▸
All three doors share one requirement the provincial registry does not grant: being able to have people and spares up there when the weather closes the road. Between 21 and 23 July 2026 the puna sat at 27 degrees below zero with winds above 170 km/h, provincial route 43 became impassable and 23 people had to be rescued. An availability contract is won or lost there.

Which projects move this demand

Lithium brine project in the Salar del Hombre Muerto (western zone), to produce 12,000 t/yr of lithium carbonate equivalent…

see the project →
USD 251 M Apr 6, 2026 ↗

Expansion (Phase 1B) of the historic Fénix lithium-carbonate project in the Salar del Hombre Muerto, operated by Rio Tinto via Minera del Altiplano…

see the project →

Tres Quebradas stage 2: plant and infrastructure for 40,000 t/year of lithium carbonate via direct extraction (DLE), per art…

see the project →

When the window opens

The grid reaches the puna one job at a time and with different destinations: supplying the villages is one thing, supplying a lithium plant is another. The 500 kV Chaparro – Antofagasta de la Sierra – Punta – Cobos line appears under that exact name on the list of priority works since May 2025 and still has no tender called. The one that is moving is a different one, and they should not be confused: a medium-voltage line that will integrate the Puna into the provincial power system (Villa Vil, Barranca Larga, Laguna Blanca, El Peñón and Antofagasta de la Sierra), with its continuation contracted in March 2026 and completion expected in the second half of 2027. ⚠️ For that work we found no award act published, no tender documents, no amount and no contractor, and the official release does not say whom it supplies. These four numbers tell you which of the two is happening.

What to watchWhat changes when it happensStatus
The tender call for the 500 kV line to Antofagasta de la Sierra
It is the only fact that puts an expiry date on selling power at the site at mine scale. While there is no call, there is no clock.
a priority work, named on the official list, with the regime defined and no tender called.
See the evidence
The only one called under the concession regime is the one for greater Buenos Aires, published on 12 August 2026 with bids opening at 120 days
verif Aug 12, 2026 ↗
The provincial electricity works reaching the puna villages
It switches off the public half of the business —the villages and the parks paid for by the mining trust— and not necessarily the mine's: they are two different buyers and it is best not to mix them.
continuation contracted according to the announcement of 25 March 2026, with 17 kilometres already inaugurated between Villa Vil and Barranca Larga and completion due in the second half of 2027.
See the evidence
⚠️ The provincial statement headlines «33 kV» and in the body says «33 KVA», which is not the same magnitude: the voltage is not confirmed, and neither does the award act appear
prob Mar 25, 2026 ↗
The operations still generating with diesel
It is the whole denominator of the number. Today it is two out of four; each one that moves to the grid or to gas cuts the market in direct proportion.
two out of four: Sal de Vida Stage 1 prob Rio Tinto annual report 2025 and Hombre Muerto Oeste unconf.
See the evidence
Fénix runs on gas through a dedicated pipeline unconf and Tres Quebradas on the grid through its own 132 kV line unconf
prob Aug 30, 2026 ↗
The price of diesel delivered at the site
It is the big term in the subtraction that yields the number —USD 702 of the 943— and it is also the saving offered to the client when moving to solar with batteries. If diesel falls, the case for conversion shrinks and the contractable layer weighs relatively more.
there is no public series for bulk diesel at a mine site: the USD 0.854 per litre this page uses is our own assumption and it is declared.
See the evidence
The official series that does exist is the pump price per service station, and ⚠️ for Catamarca it lags —the whole province's latest declaration is from 19 August 2026 and the only station in Tinogasta last declared in July 2025—, so it does not serve as a current price for this calculation
unconf Sep 14, 2026
What signals the game has changed
The high-voltage line, the structural brake, announced three times over

There are three routes announced to the same destination and none with a tender called. (1) The private line that Central Puerto and YPF Luz agreed to study and develop in January 2025: their own press release speaks of some 140 kilometres extendable to 350 and of USD 250 to 400 million verif, and it gives no voltage, no capacity and no date.

See the evidence
(2) Genneia's Línea Minera, at USD 400 M, announced and with no act behind it. (3) The 500 kV Chaparro – Antofagasta de la Sierra – Punta – Cobos line, which does appear under that exact name on the official list of priority works and which since December 2025 is tendered as a public works concession — but the only call open under that regime is the one for greater Buenos Aires, and that line starts at Chaparro, which only has 500 kV if another job on the same list is built. When one of them turns from announcement into act, selling power at the site starts to have an expiry date.
The buyer says out loud that it wants to buy less of this

The buyer itself published it: Sal de Vida's technical report sets the goal of 30 % of its first stage's energy coming from its own solar plant.

See the evidence
A niche whose customer publishes its plan to shrink it reads differently: the contract worth fighting for is not selling fuel, it is executing the conversion and operating whatever remains.
The Vicuñas pipeline would change the equipment, not just the supplier

TGN's project adds up to some 300 km of 12-inch pipe, 1.5 million cubic meters a day and USD 370 M of investment, according to its general manager in November 2024 prob press, on a route from Susques to Antofagasta de la Sierra.

See the evidence
If it gets built, converting diesel generation to gas in the puna stops being hypothetical — and anyone who specialized in diesel engines needs to have changed their offering beforehand.
The base has already shrunk on its own twice, and it can happen again

Of Catamarca's four lithium operations, two left diesel before this niche existed: Fénix with a dedicated 135 km gas pipeline and Tres Quebradas with its own 132 kV line unconf.

See the evidence
Kachi could be the third: its supply study with YPF Luz has already concluded that the grid is viable. Every exit shrinks the market without anyone competing for it.
See the remaining 2 risks
The headline figure depends on two ramp-ups that have not happened yet

Sal de Vida is in commissioning and its first production is in the second half of 2026; Hombre Muerto Oeste processed its first chloride on 28 May 2026.

See the evidence
If either delays its ramp-up, the bottom of the band is what applies. The indicator that says so is public: the production each operator declares in its quarterly report.
Nobody publishes the installed self-generation capacity of the private plants

The province's research declares it as a gap: the self-generation capacity in MW of Fénix and Sal de Oro could not be confirmed. That is why this figure is built from the cost per tonne of product rather than from installed MW, which would be the natural route. If that capacity were published, the method could be redone from the other side and cross-checked.

The opportunity in depth

How to get inthe gap and the routes that open it
1

Operating and maintaining the plant, which is what the technical report itself leaves out of its figure. The reference energy cost is built as fuel plus depreciation of the equipment over seven years, and states verbatim that it does not include operator or labor. That layer exists, it gets paid for, and it has no declared Catamarca supplier.

2

Installing fuel tanks and dispensing at the site, with remote metering. Tanks, dispensing, metering and on-site consumption control. It is the part of diesel that really is a service —trunk haulage is counted by the outbound logistics sheet— and it is where a small firm gets in without buying an engine. And since January 2026 there is a calendar framing it: a provincial resolution establishes a winter procedure from 1 May to 30 September each year —or earlier, if local conditions warrant it— whose stated purpose includes planning fuel storage to sustain operations through periods of isolation.

3

Batteries, which do not exist anywhere in Catamarca's puna. The installed fleet —600.30 kW at Antofagasta de la Sierra, 300 kW plus 660 kW of diesel at El Peñón, and the private plants— reports no storage in any source. And the precedent next door is already measured: Lindero, in Salta, cuts 40 % of its diesel with 6 MWp and 12 MWh of batteries.

4

The two parks the province has still not built. The provincial distributor's plan has four parks for the Antofagasta department and two are done: Antofalla and La Ciénaga would be missing, a fact we have not confirmed. They would be paid for by the Salar del Hombre Muerto mining trust, which is a different buyer from the miner and with a different purchasing process.

What you needcapital, certification, tax regime and who pays
Energy's weight in site cash cost
30 % — USD 943 per tonne
Of those 943, how much is contractable
26 % of the bill; the rest is the diesel molecule
Operations still on diesel
2 de 4
Installed batteries reported in Catamarca's puna
none, in any source
▸ You tell us where to see what your company does and we tell you whether we see a sign that it fits this opportunity, with the evidence behind it. See if my company fits this opportunity →
When you get paid, and what blocks it
High and structural, because it is not discretionary spending: energy is 30 % of the site cash cost of a brine lithium mine —second after reagents and above labor, according to the cost table in Sal de Vida's technical report. A plant down at an evaporation operation is lost production inside a process window that lasts months. That sustains availability retainers with penalties, which is the highest-margin contract form in the business. And there is a second payer almost nobody looks at: the Salar del Hombre Muerto mining trust, which already paid for the puna's two existing hybrid parks and would have two more unbuilt unconf.
Who you compete againstwho is already there and what share they take
Who is
already in
Market
split
The mining operator itself (Rio Tinto at Sal de Vida, Galan at Hombre Muerto Oeste)most of the operation

Today the power plant is a mine asset and the mine runs it. A third party running it is precisely what the province's research declares to be the missing link: there is no generation, transmission or electrical maintenance layer sold as a service, even though it is the business's second-largest cost.

Equipment manufacturers and their official aftersales networkthe equipment and original spares

The genset, the turbine and the critical spare are imported, and the brand controls warranty service. That part is not contested: it is captive by design.

Contractor with a track record of hybrid generation built in the provincethe public microgrids

Awarded the El Peñón hybrid solar park —300 kW of photovoltaics and two 330 kW diesel gensets—, with a tender budget of around USD 1.5 M in 2019 prob. It is the only contractor with a published track record of hybrid generation built in Catamarca's puna, and the buyer for that job was the mining trust, not an operator.

Energía de Catamarca (EC SAPEM)the puna's public grid

It is the provincial distributor and the owner of both hybrid parks, as well as the builder of the 33 kV line that connects the Puna to the provincial system. It does not compete for the mining contract: it is the customer on the public side and the one tendering the two parks still missing.

The jobs it createsThe niche has a measured, published externality worth stating because it is the sales argument: the Antofagasta de la Sierra solar park saves around USD 140,000 a year in diesel and transport, and the Salta precedent at Lindero cuts 40 % of annual diesel and with it 10,630 tonnes of carbon dioxide.

the detail on jobs and trades
In a province where diesel arrives over gravel and above 4,000 meters, every liter not burned is also a truck that does not go up. On the social side, electrifying the puna also reaches the towns: the El Peñón park gave that town 24-hour electricity for the first time, and both existing installations were paid for by the Salar del Hombre Muerto mining trust — that is, lithium money financing the grid of the town that produces it.

How we
calculate it

The number is our own estimate. The calculation, step by step, is below.

The full calculation, step by step
NO WINDOW — perpetual opex. This niche does NOT spread a capex: it measures spending that runs every day for as long as the plant is running, just like the province's reagents and laboratory sheets. Its annual figure is NOT comparable with that of the Catamarca niches that divide over the canonical 2026-2029 window, nor with the two that divide over the extended 2026-2031 one, nor with the fiscal metering one, which divides over 4 years. The hybrid conversion block, which does have a window, is declared separately at the end and is NOT added to the headline figure.STEP 1 — WHO RUNS ON DIESEL, WHICH IS WHERE THIS NICHE IS DECIDED. It is not «Catamarca's puna»: it is two operations out of four, and the other two already left.
OperationHow it is powered todayCounts
Fénix (Rio Tinto), 30 to 40 ktpa of carbonatenatural gas through a dedicated 135 km pipeline from Salar de Pocitos, plus its own electrical system unconfNO
Tres Quebradas (Zijin-Liex), 20 to 40 ktpagrid, through its own 132 kV, 50 km line from the ET Tinogasta substation, with two 60 MVA transformers unconf la línea de 132 kV que financia Liex une Tinogasta con Fiambalá y ninguna fuente dice que llegue al salarNO
Sal de Vida Stage 1 (Rio Tinto), 15 ktpaits own diesel generation; gas and solar declared «for later on» prob Rio Tinto annual report 2025YES
Hombre Muerto Oeste (Galan), 4 to 5.2 ktpa of LCEdiesel gensets plus its own solar park, authorized in the Phase 2 exploitation permit unconfYES
Kachi (Lake), pre-FIDthe supply study with YPF Luz concluded that the grid «is a viable solution»NO — declared upside, not added
STEP 2 — THE BREAKDOWN, WHICH IS WHERE THE FIGURE COMES FROM. Table 21-2 of Sal de Vida's technical report publishes the operating cost structure per tonne of carbonate: reagents 1,314 (42 %), energy 943 (30 %), labor 403 (13 %), consumables 268, general expenses 218, site cash cost 3,146, transport and port 133, FOB cash cost 3,279 = USD 148 M/yr. ⛔ And here there is a declared assumption, which is not papered over: the method uses USD 702 per tonne of fuel and USD 0.854 per litre of diesel delivered on site, and neither of the two figures appears in the technical report. The whole document was gone through —289 pages, the 707,000 characters of its text layer—: section 21.3.2 (pages 242-243, read in full) on fuel says one single sentence, *«Diesel pricing estimates are based on current actuals»*, with no number; Table 21-2 has seven rows and none is fuel; and Figure 21-1, rendered as an image in case the datum lived inside the chart, is a five-slice pie —reagents, labour, energy, general expenses and consumables— with no energy breakdown. ⇒ the subtraction 943 − 702 = 241 stands as arithmetic, but its second term is an assumption of ours, and that is how it reads, not as a figure from the report.The subtraction is the entire method: 943 minus 702 = USD 241 per tonne. That 26 % of the energy bill is the equipment, its operation and its maintenance. That is what gets contracted out to a third party; the other 702 is a purchase from the oil company.⭐ The document's two production levels do not contradict each other: they are stages. Table 21-2 publishes THREE column pairs, not one. Stage 1: USD 3,612 per tonne and USD 54 M a year ⇒ 15 thousand tonnes. Stage 2: USD 3,113 and USD 93 M ⇒ 30 thousand. Stages 1+2: USD 3,279 and USD 148 M ⇒ 45 thousand. They are the first stage, the second and the sum. The headline figure is calculated on intensity —dollars per tonne— so it does not depend on which of the three annual totals is taken. STEP 3 — THE CROSS-CHECK NOBODY WENT LOOKING FOR, AND IT CLOSES. At 702 dollars per tonne of fuel at 0.854 a liter you get 822 liters per tonne; at 0.28 liters per kWh [own assumption, specific consumption of a diesel genset at rated load] that is 2.94 MWh per tonne. So the 943 dollars of energy work out to USD 321 per MWh. The Hombre Muerto Norte technical report publishes USD 311 per MWh of Electricity Cost in its Table 21-11 for an isolated plant on the same salar, with the verbatim scope *«derived from the average fuel usage of a suitably sized diesel-generated power plant, factoring in the depreciation of the equipment over a seven-year period»*. Two independent technical documents, 3 % apart. And that second report's scope confirms this niche's boundary in writing: that figure does not include the plant's operator or labor, meaning the service layer sits on top of the 311, not inside it.STEP 4 — THE CALCULATION, WITH BOTH CUTS APPLIED.- Sal de Vida Stage 1: 15,000 t × USD 241/t = USD 3.62 M/yr at nameplate capacity. With a 60 to 100 % ramp (it is in commissioning, first production in the second half of 2026): USD 2.2 to 3.6 M/yr.- Hombre Muerto Oeste: 4,000 t of lithium equivalent at the same value per tonne = USD 0.96 M/yr at full intensity. But HMW does not crystallise carbonate: it produces chloride concentrate at 6 % lithium through nanofiltration and pond evaporation, a less energy-intensive process, so it gets 40 to 100 % of Sal de Vida's intensity, and the ramp on top: USD 0.23 to 0.96 M/yr.- The puna's two public microgrids: the Antofagasta de la Sierra park (600.30 kW of photovoltaics hybridised with backup diesel) and the El Peñón one (300 kW of photovoltaics plus two 330 kW diesel gensets), both owned by Energía de Catamarca and financed by the mining trust. The service layer of those two installations runs to USD 0.1 to 0.3 M/yr estim own estimate on declared capacity. The only published figure on their economics is the Antofagasta park's saving: ~USD 140,000 a year in diesel and transport.TOTAL: USD 2.5 to 4.9 M/yr, midpoint ~USD 3.7 M/yr.STEP 5 — THE CONTEXT THAT GIVES THE SCALE, AND IS NOT THE MARKET. The diesel molecule those two operations burn at nameplate capacity is around USD 13 M/yr (702 dollars per tonne over 19,000 tonnes). It is not in the headline figure because it is not a satellite supplier niche: it is a purchase from YPF or Shell with a distribution margin, and its trunk haulage is already counted by the outbound logistics sheet. It is published so the proportion shows: for every contractable dollar there are three and a half of fuel, and that is the economic reason behind everything that follows.A SEPARATE BLOCK, WITH ITS OWN WINDOW — THE HYBRID CONVERSION. It is not added above because it is capex rather than opex, and because its date depends on an investment decision that has not been taken.- The buyer already declared it in writing: Sal de Vida's technical report plans a 6 MW diesel plant and says the company aims for *«30% of power generation for Stage 1 production»* to come *«from photovoltaic energy generated by a site-based solar farm»*.- The Argentine precedent exists and is measured, and it is in the puna next door: Lindero (Salta) is the first hybrid mine in the Argentine Puna — 6 MWp of photovoltaics plus 12 MWh of batteries, ~USD 40-43 M invested, 40 % less diesel a year prob specialized press; the annual saving in dollars is not published unconf; and in a single month of June 2025 it covered 26 % of demand, saving more than 286,000 liters.- And there is a gap no source fills: the solar capacity installed in Catamarca's puna reports no batteries. Not one. Added to that are the two parks in the provincial plan that have not been built yet, Antofalla and La Ciénaga unconf.⚠️ NO TAM is put on this block and the reason is stated: Lindero's capex works out to ~USD 6.7-7.2 M per MWp installed, far above what solar with batteries costs at an ordinary site, because that figure almost certainly includes electrical works and the existing thermal plant. And Sal de Vida's report does not say how many MW its solar plant would have, so there is nothing to spread that unit cost over. The gap is declared rather than filled in.

Concentration Concentration is high on the equipment side and low on the service side, and that asymmetry is the way in. The genset, the turbine and the original spare are controlled by the brand and are not contested. But operating and maintaining the plant on site —what the reference technical report itself excludes in writing from its energy cost, «without operator or labor»— has no declared Catamarca supplier. The province's mining services chamber carries renewable energy in its own name, and the supplier chamber's map of business lines does not register a single member in instrumentation and automation. The only contractor with hybrid work built in the puna is a single one, and its buyer was the mining trust, not an operator.

The rule that moves it

Here the rule does not create the demand —the mine needs electricity with or without a law— but it decides who can invoice it and who pays for the public part:

See the underlying reading

The underlying policy that opens up this demand. It is the same inference declared by the rules and the program pillars pushing in this direction.

the asset leaves demand that does not expire
enables
Re.P.E.M.: Catamarca's mining local-content rule is a resolution, not a law
See the rule →
The provincial supplier registry is the way into the mining contract: being registered makes the invoice count towards the local-purchase commitments the operator has to demonstrate.
See the full legal grounds
For this business line the Catamarca payroll requirement is achievable —electricians and engine mechanics exist in the province and in the corridor's towns— but the registry does not grant what actually holds people back: on-site fuel storage and dispensing, which has its own permit, and high-altitude work certification for staff.
enables
Mining revenue does not go to the budget: it goes to a trust decided by a committee of three
See the rule →
It is the payer for the public half of this niche and almost nobody looks at it. The mining royalties fund financed the two hybrid parks that exist in the puna today —Antofagasta de la Sierra and El Peñón— and funds the medium-voltage line that will connect the Puna to the provincial system, whose continuation the provincial government announced as contracted in March 2026, due to finish in the second half of 2027.
See the full legal grounds
Two parks in the plan would remain unbuilt, Antofalla and La Ciénaga, a fact we have not confirmed. It is a public buyer: you get in through a tender rather than a quote to the operator, with a different payment timeline and a different set of specifications.

Where the number comes from

~USD 3.7 M/yr at the midpoint; the defensible band is USD 2.5-4.9 M/yr. It is small, and the reason is the finding: two of the four operations already left diesel

See the calculation, the variables and how it was validated

The figure is built from three published variables and one subtraction. Change one and the total recalculates.

the tonnes of lithium produced by the two operations still on diesel, times the USD 241 per tonne that energy costs excluding fuel, with two cuts: chloride's lower intensity and the start-up ramp=~USD 3.7 M/yr at the midpoint; the defensible band is USD 2.5-4.9 M/yr
Energy per tonne of carbonateUSD 943 (30 % of site cash cost)annual review
Operating cost table from Sal de Vida's technical report. It is the business's second-largest expense, behind reagents (1,314) and ahead of all labor (403).
Fuel per tonneUSD 702 per tonne, with diesel at USD 0,854 a liter delivered on siteannual review
⚠️ Our own assumption, not a figure from the report. Neither of the two figures appears in the Sal de Vida technical report: its 289 pages, section 21.3.2 in full, Table 21-2 and Figure 21-1 inspected as an image were all reviewed. It is the second term of the subtraction that produces this page's figure, and it reads as an assumption for as long as no source turns up to support it.
The contractable part, which is the subtractionUSD 241 per tonne (26 % of the energy bill)annual review
The equipment, its operation and its maintenance. The Hombre Muerto Norte technical report confirms the boundary in writing: its energy cost does not include the plant's operator or labor.
Operations still on dieseltwo out of fourlive data
Sal de Vida Stage 1 and Hombre Muerto Oeste. Fénix runs on gas through a dedicated pipeline and Tres Quebradas on the grid through its own 132 kV line, two facts we have not yet confirmed with a source. Kachi could be the third exit: its supply study has already concluded that the grid is viable.

The number rests on a few variables. The formula shows how it moves when each one changes; and each variable carries its freshness seal — how often it is worth revisiting. estim

How solid the number is estim

The figure does not come from counting generators, because nobody publishes the installed self-generation capacity of the private plants and the province's own research declares it as a gap. It comes from a subtraction that is published: Sal de Vida's technical report puts energy at USD 943 per tonne of carbonate and, in another paragraph of the same document, fuel at USD 702. The difference —USD 241 per tonne— is everything that is not the diesel molecule: the equipment, its operation and its maintenance. That is all we count. Then we apply two cuts: Hombre Muerto Oeste does not produce carbonate but chloride concentrate, a less energy-intensive process, and both operations are starting up, so they get a ramp-up. And there is a cross-check we were not looking for and it closed: along this route the energy cost works out to USD 321 per MWh, and a different technical report —the Hombre Muerto Norte one— publishes USD 311 per MWh for the same type of plant. Two independent documents, 3 % apart. What we deliberately leave out is the diesel itself: it is around USD 13 M a year, but it is a purchase from the oil company and not a supplier business. ⚠️ And about the fuel figure we say what we know: we reopened the whole Sal de Vida report on 1 September 2026 and that figure is not in the document, even though this page attributed it to it. The energy figure of USD 943 per tonne is in its Table 21-2 and we opened it with our own eyes; the USD 702 of fuel we subtract from it is, until its origin turns up, our own assumption and not a figure from the report.

Coverage: CAPPROMIN's trade map, the provincial chamber of mining suppliers (19 trades and 123 memberships, with a 2023 cut-off: three members in electrical services and no trade for instrumentation and automation), and the membership list of CASEMICA & ER, the sector's other chamber · Sep 14, 2026 · not reviewed: the Re.P.E.M., which is the mandatory provincial register, publishes the total number of registrants but never the names; and no operator publishes who holds the operation and maintenance contract for its power plant

How to cite this figure: Despegue (2026). Isolated power in Catamarca's puna: operating and maintaining the diesel plants and converting them to hybrid · Catamarca. despegueargentina.com/en/catamarca/energia-aislada-puna-diesel · terms of use

Neighbouring markets2 markets in the same group, from USD 11 to USD 98 M a year

First step · free
The first read of your company

We look at what your company does and tell you whether we see a sign that it fits this market, with the evidence behind it. If we do not see one, we say so too and name the condition that would change it. One page as a dated PDF, within 48 working hours.

Not here for a company? Invest · Work (in Spanish) · Start a business (in Spanish) · Institutions
Page 1 of the example executive summaryOpen the report ↗A real analysis · a real company, open in full →
Ignacio Aredez
Analysis and curation: Ignacio Aredez
Head of Despegue
Method and track record →
  • 20+ years in technology, 15 of them in data and AI, for clients across Europe and the Americas
  • Certified in AI governance (ISO/IEC 42001)
  • Machine Learning (Google Cloud)
  • Registered expert with the European Commission
How to read the seals →
  verif primary source · prob primary source pending · unconf a source said it · estim our own calculation · thesis our reading · the date belongs to the datum, at the precision its source allows
This is not financial advice. The TAM is an estimate with a transparent method, not an official figure; the framing is labeled as thesis. Every figure carries its source. ← All opportunities in Catamarca