Despegue REFORMS ESEN
up to date · reviewed Aug 30, 2026
The norm, in detail

Inocencia Fiscal II: the caps go, and ARCA needs a large gap to challenge a return

Executive branch bill · passed the lower house Aug 26, 2026
pendingNATIONAL Fiscal and monetary anchor

What changed and who it applies to

What changed
Nothing yet: it is a bill that cleared the lower house. It is not a new law but the second round of the Inocencia Fiscal already in force — the committee report itself says it amends «the laws on the simplified income tax return and on tax statutes of limitation (11.683 and 27.799) and on the penalty regime (25.191)». What it proposes to change: remove the entry caps to the simplified regime —today only taxpayers with up to $1,000 million in income and up to $10,000 million in assets qualify— and raise the bar for ARCA to challenge a return, which would require a gap of at least 15%. Public officials are excluded from the benefit. The timeline: majority committee report with 44 signatures from the Budget and Treasury and the Criminal Legislation committees on August 12, 2026, and passage on August 26 with 139 votes in favor, 110 against and 2 abstentions. It moves to the Senate. ⚠️ The Chamber's own release stresses that «this is not an amnesty». prob · Aug 26, 2026
In force
Not in force. It passed the Chamber of Deputies on August 26, 2026 and moved to the Senate. What does apply today is the parent law, Ley 27.799, in force since January 2, 2026. prob · Aug 26, 2026
Who it affects
Anyone holding savings outside the system who cannot use them to operate on the books today: buying property, putting capital into an SME, or qualifying for credit. And on the other side, ARCA, which would lose room to challenge a simplified return. For the observatory it matters through one concrete channel: a satellite supplier that wants to grow needs to show assets to take on credit or to qualify in a supplier registry, and that is precisely the savings it cannot declare today. thesis · Aug 12, 2026

Our reading

The first Inocencia Fiscal left out those who needed it most because of an entry cap; this one removes it. If it passes, informal savings stop being a criminal liability and become declarable capital, which is the raw material of an SME that wants to qualify as a supplier (R10 · cheaper to meet the demand). ⚠️ It has only cleared one chamber: what changed is the probability, not the rule. thesis

Where it lands, province by province

Applies the same nationwide

We looked at this rule from each of the five provinces we track and found no effect that lands differently in any of them: it applies the same across the country.

The other rules on this subject20

Fiscal Package: asset amnesty, moratorium and tax cutsLey 27.743 (Official Gazette Jul 8, 2024)in force
Fiscal anchor: surplus two years in a rowExecutive execution policy on the extended budget (Decreto 1131/2024)in force
Payment to holdouts: closing the 2001-default lawsuitsLey 27.818 (promulgated by Decreto 564/2026, Official Gazette Jul 1, 2026)in force
The "lock on the State": fiscal balance by lawLey 27.798 (2026 Budget), art. 1 — in force; the permanent "lock on the State" still a billpending
PAÍS Tax: it rose, fell and expiredDecreto 29/2023 + Decreto 777/2024 (expiry of Ley 27.541, 12/23/2024)in execution
Renting out and selling housing no longer pays income taxLey 27.802 Title XXIV + Decreto 406/2026 (Official Gazette Jun 1, 2026)in force
Write to us · free

Get on board the takeoff

Tell us what you are looking for and we will reply. This is what we work on: reforms, RIGI and verified program data.

no spam we read every one
Which are you?
What are you looking for?
Tell us more
Your provinces empty = all
pick one or more
Fact sheet built on the published rule, with the gaps declared. Back to the reforms
How to read the seals →   verif primary source · prob primary source pending · unconf not sufficiently backed · estim our own calculation · thesis our reading