Despegue REFORMS ESEN
up to date · reviewed Sep 2, 2026
The norm, in detail

Digital signature: no office visit required

Decree 743/2024 (Official Gazette, Aug 20, 2024)
in forceNATIONAL Market deregulation

What changed and who it applies to

What changed
Decree 743/2024 removes the in-person appointment from the digital signature process. It amends two sections of the regulation of Law 25,506 (Annex to Decree 182/2019). The new subsection 2 of section 21 requires "verifying identity through biometric authentication factors" and adds, verbatim, that "such identity verification may or may not be carried out in person, for which purpose real-time identity validation services must be used that cross-check data from the NATIONAL REGISTRY OF PERSONS". The new section 27 puts it plainly: "The physical presence of the applicant or subscriber before the Licensed Certifier or its Registration Authorities shall not be an unavoidable condition for completing the procedures required to issue, renew or revoke the digital certificate". In 2025, Resolution SICYT 11/2025 updated certifier procedures and technical guidelines, with eight annexes that include fees, and repealed resolutions 116/17, 42/19 and 946/21. verif · Aug 20, 2024
In force
In force since its publication in the Official Gazette, on August 20, 2024. verif · Aug 20, 2024
Are you in or out?
Any person or company that needs to sign legally valid documents without paper: the process no longer requires appearing before the certifier or its registration authority. On the other side it reaches Licensed Certifiers and their Registration Authorities, which may now validate identity in real time against the national ID registry. verif · Aug 20, 2024
The norm
Decree 743/2024, published in the Official Gazette on Aug 20, 2024 (issue 35486), signed by Milei, Francos and Sturzenegger. It amends the Annex to Decree 182/2019, which regulates Law 25,506 on Digital Signatures. verif · Aug 20, 2024

Our reading

Digital signatures have had full legal validity in Argentina since 2001, so what was missing was never the law: it was the in-person appointment. Removing it turns a multi-day errand into a few minutes, and for an SME in the interior invoicing a project 400 km away, that is the difference between signing a contract the same day and sending someone into the city (R4 · opening and deregulation). thesis

Where it lands, province by province

Impact by province, pending

Once we measure how this rule lands in each province, it shows up here.

The other rules on this subject37

Mega-DNU: the regulatory chainsawDecreto 70/2023 (DNU-2023-70-APN-PTE)in force
Rentals: freedom of contract returnsDNU 70/2023, art. 249in force
The IGJ digitizes companies' financial statementsIGJ General Res. 9/2026 (RESOG-2026-9-APN-IGJ#MJ), Official Gazette Jul 2, 2026in force
Domestic trade: price-control and intervention rules fallRes. 12/2026 SIC (Official Gazette Jun 9, 2026)in force
Ley Hojarasca: cleanup of the legal framework (still in the Senate)Bill CD-1/26 (first-round approval May 20, 2026)pending
Ignacio Aredez
Ignacio Aredez· Chief analyst
Credentials and track record →
  • 10+ years in data science for clients across Europe and the Americas
  • Certified in AI governance (ISO/IEC 42001)
  • Machine Learning (Google Cloud)
  • Registered expert with the European Commission
Write to us · free

Get on board the takeoff

Tell us what you are looking for and we will reply. This is what we work on: niches, trades, projects and rules — where to get in.

no spam we read every one
Which are you?
What are you looking for?
Tell us more
Your provinces empty = all
pick one or more
Fact sheet built on the published rule, with the gaps declared. Back to the reforms
How to read the seals →   verif primary source · prob primary source pending · unconf not sufficiently backed · estim our own calculation · thesis our reading